王秀梅;李小玲;

• 1:西北政法大学
• 2:中央财经大学会计学院

摘要(Abstract)：

国际社会对安理会根据《联合国宪章》通过的一些决议和采取的行动是否超越《联合国宪章》赋予的权限存在争议,安理会的一些决议和行动被认为超越了其执行职能而行使了决议造法职能,安理会的行动体越来越现出"自组织性"特征,面临合法性的质疑。西方国际法学学者则持坚决主张对国际法院对安理会的司法审查权,以加强对安理会行动的制衡。对安理会决议进行司法审查的必要性还表现在安理会决议不能违背国际法。安理会和国际法院的关系问题是联合国的宪政问题,是否引入司法审查关系到联合国的未来发展。目前学者关于建立国际法院对安理会司法审查权有关路径的建议均需对联合国制度进行重大改革。

关键词(KeyWords)： 安理会;国际法院;决议造法;司法审查;国际组织性宪政

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(项目编号:NCET-09-695)

作者(Author): 王秀梅;李小玲;

Email:

DOI:

参考文献(References)：

• [1]Mohammed Bedjaoui,The NewWorld and the Se-curity Council,Dordrecht:Martunus Nijhoff Pubil-ishers,1994,PP.37-53.
• [2]Libya V.United States,1992 Icj Reports,pp.133-170.
• [3][德]马克斯.韦伯著.林荣远译.《经济与社会》(上册):239页.
• [4][德]哈贝马斯.交往与社会进化张[M].博树译.重庆出版社,1989:184.
• [5]高建军.从“洛克比案”看安理会同国际法院的关系[J].中外法学,1998,(1):88.
• [6]Thomas M.Franck,The"Powers of Apprecia-tion":Who is the Ultimate Guardian of U.N.Le-gality?,86 AM.J.INT'L L.519(1992).
• [7]See S/Res./1368(2001),S/Res./1373(2001).
• [8]See S/Res./1540(2004).
• [9]简基松.对安理会“决议造法”--行为之定性分析与完善建言[J].法学,2009,(10):77.
• [10]Brief to Support the motion(of the Defence)onthe Jurisdiction of the tribunal before theTrialChamber of the InternationalTribunal,23 June1995,Case No.IT-94-1-T,at para.321.
• [11]伊恩.布朗利.国际公法原理[M].曾令良、余敏友等,译.法律出版社,2003:759.
• [12]PCIJ[R].Series.B,Nos.2-3:55-57.
• [13]曾令良.冷战后时代的国家主权[J].中国法学,1998,(1):116-117.
• [14]蔡从燕.国际法语境中的宪政问题研究:WTO宪政之意蕴[J].法商研究,2006(2):84-87.
• [15]Keith Hatter,Does the United Nations SecurityCouncil Have the Competence to Act as Court andLegislature?,27 N.Y.U.J.Int'l L.&Pol.103,105(1994).
• [16]Report of International LawCommission in 2002,Chapter 9“The fragmentation of International Law:Difficulties Arising in the Differentiation and theExpansion of International Law.
• [17]林健聪.联合国安全理事会与国际法院的权力冲突[J].云南大学学报法学版,2010,(1):134.
• [18]Bruno Simma,From Bilateralism to CommunityInterest in International Law[J].The Hague:Re-cueil Des Cours,Vol.250(1994).Armin Bogdandy,Constitutionalism in InternationalLaw:Comment on a Proposal fron Germany,47Harvard International Law Journal,Volume 47,Number One,Winter2006,p.223-224.
• [19][日]篠田英朗.重新审视主权:从古典理论到全球时代[M].戚渊,译.商务印书馆,2004:148.
• [20]Kathylem Renee Cronin-Furman,The Interna-tional Court of Justice and The United Nations Se-curity Council:Rethinking a Complicated Rela-tionship,Columbia Law journal,435-445,(2006).
• [21]Legal Consequences for States of the ContinuedPresence of South Africa in Namibia(South-WestAfrica)notwithstanding Security Council Resolu-tion 276(1970)”,1971 ICJ Report 16,at para.89(Advisory Opinion).
• [22]蔡从燕.国内公法对国际法的影响[J].法学研究,2009,(1):186.
• [23]Rosalyn Higgins,The Place of International Lawin the Settlement of Disputes by the Security Coun-cil,64 American Journal of International Law.
• [24]Jan Klabbers.An Introduction to International In-stitutional Law,published on 18.Feb.2003,Cam-bridge University Press,pp.246.
• [25]See Alvarez,Judging the Security Council,Amer-ican Journal of International Law,January,1996,Vol.80.